Let’s talk about Villains. Why? Because they’re so damn cool. Sure, powers are awesome, but it’s the villains that
really make the story interesting. They’re at the heart of the conflict, driving the plot forward to that long awaited final showdown. Without a villain, the protagonist would just be hanging around, living a boring life. Or even worse, the hero would be *gasp* happy. Who wants to read about someone being happy all the time? No fun in that.
So which kind of villain do you prefer? I’ve noticed two main types in fiction and movies. What better way to elaborate than with Marvel villains Venom and Carnage. After all, they’re both just men who bonded with an alien symbiote. However, the resulting villains are very different villain types.
The Venom Type
Eddie Brock (who always leaps to mind when I think of Venom) is kind of a jerk. As they say in Game of Thrones, “It is known.” But is he enough of a jerk to be a sadistic killer? Not really – which is why it’s more of a gray area with Venom. Is the alien symbiote evil? Without a doubt. But part of the deal is that symbiotic relationship, so no matter how powerful the alien becomes feeding off the anger and fear in the host, some part of the host is still there. For this reason, Spidey has been able to talk Venom down in the past, appealing to the flawed yet still human part that is Eddie Brock.
The Carnage Type
In sharp contrast is Cletus Kasady, who is not only insane, but abnormally violent. Even the way the symbiote bonds with him is telling – it’s not just a suit, it’s part of his bloodstream. So absolute, as is his nature. This is a villain that is pure evil, as black and white (well, red actually 🙂 ) as it gets. There’s no humanizing this guy…even his backstory doesn’t lend itself to sympathy. If given the chance, he will kill you in a magnificently gory fashion, rivaled only by select scenes from the latest wave of torture horror.
The More Popular Trend
It seems to me there are more and more Venom type villains lately, whereas in the past it was less nebulous – the villain was to be hated and not allowed to play in any of the reindeer games under any circumstances.
One of the
worst (if not the absolute worst) remakes of all time is Halloween, for the simple fact that it attempts to change the villain type from black and white to gray by humanizing Michael Myers. What I loved most about the original movie is the ending, when Dr. Loomis calls him the “Boogeyman.” The fact that he’s not even called Michael Myers in the credits, but simply “The Shape.” There’s something powerful and terrifying in that. If you can’t outrun him, you’re dead. Not even a knitting needle to the skull will stop this guy—he’s got the power of pure evil to resurrect him from multiple gunshot wounds, granting him that highly sought after Highlander-esque immortality.
But I digress. The thing is, I’ve been criticized about my villain in the past, for Connected. As I don’t tend to dwell on criticism I don’t recall the exact words, but it was something about either motive or the fact that he didn’t have that “gray” side to him. This gave me pause to think about my favorite villains, to consider which type they resemble.
Venom
or Carnage
Dr. Facilier from The Princess & the Frog ![]()
The Tall Man (RIP Angus) from Phantasm ![]()
![]()
Really any of the iconic horror movie villains of yesteryear ![]()
Hmmm… I’m sensing a pattern here. Did Buttonface need a motive? Nope, he just truly enjoyed killing people. Sometimes, when you have the perfect blend of insanity and ill intentions, you don’t need a motive. Any humanity you could give that character would only detract from his power.
Still, I get the whole conflicted concept and I can see where it fits better with some villains. In fact, the villain in book two of the Connected series is exactly that – he is evil, but he has a good reason for being that way. Somewhat justified for his actions, as any gray villain is.
Which do you prefer? Are you a fan of the conflicted Venom-type villain? Or do you appreciate the evil purity of a villain like Carnage?
Please post a comment, I’d love to discuss this with you!




I can go with either. For the thrill that you can’t rationalize or appeal to insanity. And a flawed, gray villain is a nice foil to the hero/protagonist. After all, they too have honorable motives (at least to them) which makes for great conflict. Just as long as the characterization and storytellin makes sense. And the villain aren’t relegated to cartoon evilness or bland.
Thanks for commenting! I agree, there’s nothing worse than a bland villain. 🙂
Great post! I have been struggling with my villains. It feels like the cut and dry evil villain is easier to write. I feel like it doesn’t force any development in the story. At the same time I have trouble coming up with a god story to motivate him. That there might be the problem. Maybe I need to have some women. Puppy killers and twisted nannies?
I generally stay away from the horror genre for movies. My 9yo constantly talks about Carnage and Venom. My favorite villains have been the wife from Gone Girl is one of my favorites. Evil and spiteful.
YES!! The wife from Gone Girl was deliciously sadistic, a total psychopath. I love her too 🙂 I think you’re right about the cut and dry villain being easier to write, it certainly was much more fun for me compared to the gray villain.